Chapter XI
The Martian Inquires As To Miracles
You have several times referred to the many proofs
to establish that your god is the only true god,
remarked the Martian.
These proofs are absolute,
said the Fundamentalist.
You need only to
read of the miracles He performed,
the signs He gave,
to convince you that He is the
true God.
There are many recorded in the Bible,
said the Priest.
And they are all true,
added the Fundamentalist.
May I ask how you know they are true?
said the Martian.
Because the Bible tells of them,
and the Bible is the Word of God, answered the Fundamentalist.
If I understand you,
said the Martian, you maintain that they are true
because the book which tells of them is the word of your god,
and you know the book is the word of your god
because it tells of the miracles performed by him.
Yes, said the Fundamentalist.
The Modernist turned to the Fundamentalist:
Do you really believe, he demanded, that a whale
swallowed Jonah, retained him alive in his stomach for
several days, and then
spewed him up?
The Bible says it was done,
answered the Fundamentalist. I believe in a God
who can make a whale and can make a man,
and make both do what He pleases.
Page 77
But do you believe he made them -
that he made such a fish and that it was big enough
to swallow Jonah?
Yes, sir, said the
Fundamentalist emphatically.
Let me add:
one miracle is just as easy to believe
as another.
A Miracle is a thing performed beyond what man can perform.
When you get beyond what man can do you get within the
realm of miracles; and it is just as easy to believe the
miracle of Jonah as any other miracle in the Bible.
Perfectly easy to believe that Jonah
swallowed the whale? asked the Modernist.
His sarcasm was lost on the Fundamentalist,
who answered calmly:
Yes, if the Bible said so.
The Modernist could no longer restrain
his impatience.
Cant you see, he said to the
Fundamentalist,
it is by such ridiculous assertions
as you have been making that you throw discredit
upon the whole Christian religion? Every thinking man
knows that the laws of Nature do not change,
that every effect is the result of a natural cause,
and that therefore such a thing as a miracle is
impossible? If you would cease talking nonsense
about miracles and confine your religious utterances
to the great truths of Christianity which sensible men
can believe, you would get back to Christianity
as Jesus taught it.
I will say this,
responded the Fundamentalist with considerable heat,
it is just such men as you, who call themselves
Christians, and yet do everything in their power to
discredit the Blessed Book, that are responsible for
the spread of atheism and lawlessness throughout the land.
Page 78
Instead of fighting these blasphemous creatures of the Devil,
you encourage them in their nefarious schemes to destroy
Christianity and all morality. I would like to ask who has
given you the right to pass judgement on the inspired Book
that has been the only source of light and truth for nearly
two thousand years.
There you admit you are as guilty as he,
said the Priest, in turn addressing the Fundamentalist.
What right have you, or had those whom you profess
to follow, to dispute the correctness of the teachings of
the only true Church - the Church that was established
by God Himself, the Church whose head is appointed by
Divine guidance, the Church that for upwards of
two thousand years has withstood all attacks
and has so ably spread real Christianity and civilization over
the whole world; whose members to-day far outnumber those
of all your sects put together; the Church wherein
the Bible is read and expounded by those whom God Himself
appointed, and who, under His guidance,
teach what He taught, and in the way He commanded?
On you and your Churches, which for five hundred years
have protested against and belittled the teachings of the
Holy Catholic Church, encouraging attacks upon it,
rests the blame for the deplorable condition of Christianity to-day.
Gentlemen, said the Martian,
who had noted the acrimony of the discussion, dont you
think it would be well to get back to our subject?
I find it somewhat difficult to keep abreast of you.
Wont you point out these miracles to which you have referred?
I can do that, said the Rabbi.
You will find many of them recorded in the Old Testament,
which is the only true Word of God.
No, no, said the Fundamentalist;
you must consider the New Testament as more important than
the Old Testament, for that is the basis of the
Christian religion.
Page 79
Perhaps we should consider both,
said the Martian. He turned to the Rabbi:
Will you point out the miracles in the Old Testament?
It would take too long to enumerate all
of them, said the Rabbi, but you might turn to
the Book of Exodus, where the miracles of Moses and
his brother Aaron are recorded. Here it tells where
Aaron appeared before the King of Egypt
and cast his rod on the ground as the Lord directed,
and it changed into a living serpent, proving that
the Lord was the true God. 1
But I notice, said the Martian,
examining the account,
that the king called for
his wise men and they also cast down their rods,
which became serpents. 2
Yes, said the Rabbi,
but Aarons rod swallowed up their rods. 3
I see, said the Martian.
The Rabbi continued:
Then Aaron sat on the brink of the river,
and with his rod turned its waters to blood
as the Lord directed; all the fish died and the river
became foul and the blood rushed throughout all
the land of Egypt. 4
This showed the true God. No one but the true God
could have performed that miracle.
Nevertheless, I read in the
next paragraph, said the Martian,
that the magicians of Egypt did in like manner
with their
enchantments. 5
It is difficult to understand how they could have done so,
for all the waters had already been turned to blood;
but it does not appear that these miracles were performed
only through your god.
Oh, you do not understand,
said the Priest.
God permitted the Egyptian magicians
to do these things in order that Pharaohs heart might be
hardened so that he would not let the children
of Israel depart.
1
Exod. vii. 10.
2
Exod. vii. 11.
3
Exod. vii. 12.
4
Exod. vii. 21.
5
Exod. vii. 22.
Page 80
Ah, yes,
said the Martian,
so it appears.
You will note also that the Lord caused all of
Egypt to swarm with frogs, said
the Rabbi. 6
And that the magicians of the king
performed this miracle also,
7
added the Martian.
Yes, said the Priest,
but it was by Gods will.
May I point out one more miracle,
said the Rabbi,
which no one else ever performed -
that was when Joshua stopped the sun in its course for a
whole day?
8
Gentlemen, you amaze me,
said the Martian.
We learned many years ago
that the planets, including the earth,
move around the sun, and that the sun does not
move around the planets.
Really, said the Priest,
with an evident desire to escape from the Old Testament,
we are more concerned with the miracles of the
New Testament, for we want you to understand that
our Saviour was really God. In the first place,
His birth was a miracle, since He was born
of a virgin.
But, said the Martian,
the records in your libraries tell of many others
who were looked upon as gods because they were born
of a virgin.
But they were pagan gods,
said the Priest, and we
do not believe these myths.
But I would like to refer to a
number of them, remarked the Martian.
I find an account of a god called Buddha
who was born of a virgin mother named Maya.
It is said that his birth was brought about by the
descent of the divine power called the Holy Ghost
upon the Virgin Maya.
9
That is a myth,
said the Priest.
6
Exod. viii. 6.
7
Exod. viii. 7.
8
Josh. x. 12 - 13.
9
Doane,
Bible Myths and their Parallels in
other Religions,
7th ed.,
pp. 116 et seq.
Page 81
I find the Chinese nation,
went on the Martian,
claimed that their philosopher
Lao-tze, to whom we have already referred,
was born of a virgin.
10
All of these accounts date from before the birth of your
saviour god.
But you cannot believe that such tales
are true, said the Fundamentalist.
The Martian resumed:
I find that in Egypt a child named Horus,
who was also called a saviour, was born of the Virgin
Isis, and that pictures representing his birth
appear on the walls of temples more than two thousand
years old. His father was said to be
the god Osiris.
11
Fairy tales, all of them!
exclaimed the Fundamentalist.
I notice also,
continued the Martian, that Zoroaster,
the law-giver of the Persian nations, is said to have
been the son of a virgin.
12
In Greek records I find it stated that Bacchus was the son
of the head god Jupiter and of a mortal mother named
Semele; that Perseus was the son of Jupiter
by the virgin Danae.
13
But those all have been shown to
be myths, said the Priest.
May I ask how?
asked the Martian.
Because these things are contrary
to the Bible, said the Fundamentalist;
because there never was any God but the
true God, and no one was ever born that way
but Jesus.
I might add, said the
Martian, that I have found many more records
of virgin births, but will mention just one or
two more. It is reported that when the Spaniards
arrived in Mexico they found the Mexicans
worshipping a saviour god called Quetzalcoatl,
who was born of a virgin to whom Heaven had
announced that she should bear a son without
connection with man.
10
Doane,
Bible Myths and their Parallels
in other Religions, 7th ed.,
pp. 120 et seq.
11
Ibid., p. 122.
12
Ibid., p. 123.
13
Ibid., p. 124.
Page 82
Her name was Sochiquetzal,
and she was called the Queen
of Heaven. 14
In Yucatan they also had a virgin-born god named Zana,
who was the only begotten son of their
supreme god Kinchahan.
15
They were all heathens,
said the Fundamentalist.
Ours is the only true God.
The accounts of the others are simply myths
handed down without basis of fact.
Nevertheless, said the Martian,
I find some of your early Christian fathers referring to
these pagan gods. One of your Christian writers,
Justin Martyr, in the year A.D. 140,
writing to the pagan Roman Emperor Hadrian,
says: 16
By declaring the Logos,
the first-begotten of God, our Master, Jesus Christ,
to be born of a virgin, without any human mixture,
we say no more in this than what you say of those whom you
style the sons of Jove.
For you need not be told what a parcel of sons
the writers most in vogue among you assign to Jove. . . .
As to the son of God,
called Jesus, should we allow him to be nothing more
than man, yet the title of The Son of God
is very justifiable, upon the account of His wisdom,
considering that you have your Mercury in worship under the
title of The Word, a messenger of God. . . .
As to his being born of a virgin,
you have your Perseus to
balance that.
Yes,
said the Priest,
but did you note also that he gave the explanation
for this when he says:
17
14
Doane, Bible Myths
and their Parallels
in other Religions,
7th ed., p. 129.
15
Ibid., p. 130.
16
Apol. 1. ch. xx, xxi, xxii.
17
Ibid., ch. lix.
Page 83
It having reached the devils ears that the
prophets had foretold that Christ would come,
he set the heathen poets to bring forward
a great many who should be called the sons of Jove.
The devil laying his scheme in this,
to get men to imagine
that the true history of Christ was of
the same character as the prodigious fables
and poetic stories.
I still would inquire
why you accept as true
the story of the divine birth of your saviour
but reject the accounts of these others.
Because there are circumstances attending
the coming of our Lord which prove we are right,
said the Priest. His coming was Prophesied.
You will find it written in the Old Testament
that a virgin shall conceive and bear a son
and shall call his name Immanuel.
It was foretold!
exclaimed the Martian. He examined
the passage,
then compared it with the Hebrew text handed him by the Rabbi.
It would be remarkable if true,
he said,
but I find that
in the original of this passage in the
Hebrew language
18
the word translated as virgin really should be rendered
young woman, and that the passage should read,
Behold, the young woman is with child,
and beareth a son and calleth
his name Immanuel.
19
18
Isa. vii. 14
19
The Hebrew text is
lakem yittam adonai hu lakem oth
hinneh ha-almah harah ve-yeldeth
ben ve-kareth shem-o immanuel":
literally, Therefore shall-give
my-lord he (himself)
to you sign behold
the-young-woman
conceived (is pregnant)
and-beareth son
and-call-eth
name-his immanuel.
(Wheless: Is it Gods Word? p. 283.)
Page 84
I deny that,
said the Fundamentalist, and furthermore,
the miraculous events which occurred at the time of the birth
of Jesus are unique and prove He was God.
A new star appeared in the heavens,
the heavens rejoiced, the heavenly host sang,
wise men came from the East and recognized Him,
and a bright light shone around Him.
I have read those passages in your Bible,
said the Martian; but I have also read in the Buddhist
sacred books, which antedate your Bible, that the birth
of their Buddha, named Gautama, was announced in the
heavens by a star which was seen rising on the horizon
and known as the messianic star; that wise men known as
Holy Rishis were informed by this celestial sign that a
Messiah was born 20
You do not seem to understand that that
is a heathen myth and not the history of a true god,
said the Priest.
I find it recorded, went on
the Martian,
that when Buddha was born
all things were full of joy,
and that the attending spirits who surrounded the
Virgin Maya and the infant saviour
sang the praises of the blessed one and said:
To-day Bodhisatwa is born on earth to give joy and peace
to men, and Devas, to shed light in dark places,
and to give sight to the blind.
21
I find it recorded that Mithra, the Persian saviour,
was visited by wise men called Magi, and was presented
with gifts consisting of gold,
frankincense, and myrrh.
22
But these accounts are not inspired
accounts and are not true, said the
Fundamentalist.
To quote heathen mythical tales
proves nothing.
I find it on record,
said the Martian, that when Buddha
(called the saviour of the world) was born
a dim light danced around
his person; 23
that when Bacchus was born a bright light
shone around him so that there was a
brilliant light in the cave;
24
that when the saviour Aesculapius was born
his countenance shone like the sun
and he was surrounded by a fiery ray;
25
that as soon as Zoroaster was born
the glory arising from his body enlightened
the whole room.
26
20
Doane, Bible Myths
and their Parallels
in other Religions,
7th ed., p. 143.
21
Ibid., p. 290.
22
Ibid., p. 152.
23
Ibid., p. 157.
24
Ibid.
25
Ibid.
26
Ibid.
Page 85
All this does not
affect the claim that Jesus was the
son of God, said the Priest.
May I proceed?
asked the Martian.
As I have said,
I find many records of saviours,
the stories of whose lives on earth
and whose deeds are similar to those of your
saviour.
I am particularly
struck with the story of the Hindu god Krishna,
for I find many remarkable parallels to the story of your
saviour as told in your Bible, and I would like
to point out these parallels so that you may explain
to me why you consider one a myth
and the other a true tale.
It will be instructive,
said the Modernist.
I find, said the Martian,
that Krishna was born of a chaste virgin called Devaki,
who was selected by the Lord for this purpose
on account of her purity.
27
Vishnu, the all-ruling deity of the Hindus,
said: I will become Incarnate Mathura in the
house of Yadu and will issue forth to mortal birth
from the womb of Devaki. It is time I should display
my power and relieve the oppressed earth from its
load. 28
A chorus of Devatas celebrated with song
the praise of Devaki, exclaiming:
In the delivery of this favoured woman
all nature shall have cause to exult.
29
The birth of the child was announced in the heavens
by his star. 30
On the morn of Krishnas birth, the quarters of the
horizon were irradiate with joy, as if moonlight
was diffused over the whole earth;
the spirits and nymphs of Heaven danced and sang,
and the clouds emitted low,
pleasing sounds.
31
27
Doane, Bible Myths
and their Parallels
in other Religions,
7th ed., p. 278.
28
Ibid.,
pp. 113, 114.
29
Ibid., p. 114.
30
Ibid., p. 278.
31
Ibid., p. 279.
Page 86
Krishna, though royally descended,
was actually born in a cave in a state most abject
and humiliating.
32
The moment he was born the whole cave was splendidly
illuminated, and the countenances of his father
and mother emitted rays of glory.
33
The divine child - Krishna - was recognized as
heaven-born and adored by cowherds, who prostrated
themselves before him. He was received with
divine honours, and presented with gifts of
sandal-wood and perfumes. Soon after his birth
the holy Indian prophet Nared, having seen his star
shining in the heavens and hearing of the fame
of the infant Krishna,
paid him a visit at Gokul,
examined the stars and declared him to be of
celestial descent. Krishna was born at a time when
Nanda - his foster-father - was away
from home, having come to the city to pay his tax
or yearly tribute to the king. The ruler of the
country, having been informed of the birth of the
divine child, ordered the massacre in all his states
of all the children of the male sex born during
the night of the birth
of Krishna. 34
Do you not recognize that this is the
same story as that related in your Bible?
asked the Martian.
But we have other evidences of our
Saviours life in our sacraments that have come down
to us, said the Fundamentalist,
ignoring the question.
We know He was born on the
25th of December, because that is the day on which
we celebrate His Birth.
I must confess I do not get
your Point, said the Martian.
Is it not a fact that the 25th of December
was not adopted as the birthday of your Saviour
until about four hundred years after he lived?
35
I think that is correct,
said the Modernist.
32
Doane,
Bible Myths and their Parallels
in other Religions,
7th ed., p. 279.
33
Ibid.
34
Ibid., pp. 279, 280.
35
Ibid., p. 367.
Page 87
And it seems to me worthy
of remark, said the Martian,
that according to the records
Buddha, the son of the Virgin Maya,
was born on December 25th;
36
that the ancient Persians celebrated the birthday of
their saviour, Mithra,
on December 25th;
37
that the ancient Egyptians
for centuries before the birth of your saviour
celebrated the end of December
as an anniversary of their saviour Horus,
the son of a holy virgin who was born on December 25th;
38
that the same date is the birth of the Greek god
Bacchus, born of a virgin and called the saviour,
39
that the birthday of Adonis, another saviour,
was celebrated on December 25th.
40
They were all false
heathen gods, said the Fundamentalist,
and never existed.
The Martian went on:
I find that your church father
St. Chrysostom,
who lived about the year 390, referred to these
numerous festivals held on December 25th in the
following language: On this day also
the birth of Christ was lately fixed at Rome
in order that whilst the heathen were busy
with their profane ceremonies
the Christians might perform their holy rite undisturbed.
41
Then you speak of the celebration
of your saviours resurrection in the spring
of the year.
Yes, said the Fundamentalist.
Our Lord was crucified and was buried;
He rose again from the dead the third day,
ascended into Heaven, and sitteth on the
right hand of the Father; whence He shall come to
judge the quick and the dead.
We celebrate
Easter as the day He arose.
36
Doane,
Bible Myths and their Parallels
in other Religions,
7th ed., p. 363.
37
Ibid.
38
Ibid.
39
Ibid., p. 364.
40
Ibid.
41
Ibid., p. 367.
Page 88
But why, asked the Martian,
do you point to the ascension of your god as evidence of the
inspiration of your Bible, when from the accounts
I have read, these other saviours to whom I have just
referred also rose from the dead and ascended into Heaven
about the same time of the year?
As a matter of fact,
I learn that your very word Easter
receives its name from a celebration in honour
of the Saxon goddess
Eostre.
In looking through the records I find it is stated that
Krishna, the Hindu saviour to whom I have already referred,
was crucified but rose from the dead and ascended
into Heaven; that Buddha ascended bodily into Heaven
after his death,
as did Zoroaster, Aesculapius,
and Adonis; that Osiris,
the Egyptian saviour,
after having been put to death, arose from the dead and
ascended into Heaven and bore the title of the
Resurrected One; that Mithra, the Persian saviour,
rose from the dead, that Bacchus rose from the dead,
and that even the Mexican saviour Quetzalcoatl rose from the dead
and ascended into Heaven. These resurrections
are all said to have occurred about the time of the
vernal equinox.
42
Moreover, I find
that practically all of them died
on a cross. Your records tell of
at least sixteen
crucified saviours
who rose from the dead.
But even if that were so,
said the Fundamentalist,
it would not mean that
our Bible is not true. Those spurious miracles
you find in other so-called religions are absurd.
There is only one God; He is Lord of the universe,
and whatever takes place is by His will and direction.
I merely inquire again,
said the Martian, why you deem all these accounts
to be myths, and insist that the same story is true
when told in your Bible?
42
Doane,
Bible Myths and their Parallels
in other Religions,
7th ed., pp. 215 et seq.
Page 89
We on Mars have never known of one that rose from the dead,
and, as such an occurrence would be contrary to the
laws of Nature as we know them,
we would demand strong proof
of such an assertion before giving it credence.
But our Bible is the Word of God,
and is the truth,
said the Fundamentalist.
May I advance this thought
as to miracles generally?
remarked the Martian.
Are you not inconsistent in that you obviously
regulate your entire lives on disbelief in the interruption
of the laws of nature? You make an appointment
to meet a friend, relying upon your train or steamship
to carry you to the appointed place at the time agreed upon.
If the train is delayed, you do not pray to your god
to remove the obstacle, but your engineers look after
the defect in the machinery. When a steamer lists
or sinks you seek the cause in conformity with the
mechanical laws you have learned.
When you hear of an accident you seek its cause
along the lines of natural laws.
To-day in your ordinary affairs you no longer
ascribe interruptions in your course of life to
miracles or to the intervention of supernatural
beings, for you have learned that they are the
result of natural laws operating as
they have always operated.
That may all be true,
said the Fundamentalist;
nevertheless,
I believe in the miracles described in the Bible,
for there is no doubt that the inspired men who
wrote of them believed them, and what they were
willing to believe I am willing to believe.
In ancient times,
replied the Martian, your ancestors,
I learn, believed the sun and the moon were
pushed across the sky by angels.
Astronomy taught you they moved in accordance with
unchangeable laws, so that to-day
you are able to predict to the fraction of a second
when the shadow cast by your earth will eclipse
the light of the moon.
Page 90
You point your telescopes, and discover a planet of which
you have never heard, but which your knowledge of
mathematics and of Natures laws convinces you
exists at that particular spot. Your Ancestors believed
the coming of a storm was the caprice of a god;
meteorology to-day enables you to predict when and where
the storm will strike. They believed disease was caused
by devils or evil spirits, and relief was sought
by prayer; to-day, through the researches
of your scientists, you know that disease is due
to natural causes, and by applying sanitation
you are steadily overcoming the ravages of disease.
Why shouldnt we take advantage of
the discoveries of these men whom God has gifted
with genius? asked the Fundamentalist.
It is Gods way of showing His love for us,
permitting us to enjoy the fruits of the labours
of those men whom He has endowed with minds that
point out the way to progress.
My point is, answered the
Martian, that when you ceased to see your god
in the lightning, and to believe that the destruction
of your houses was a visitation of your god,
you invented the lightning-rod and protected
your homes. You learned the reason for the
winds and tides, and to-day your airmen consult
your meteorologists instead of resorting to oracles
and offering prayers and sacrifices as you did
in the past. When you studied Natures ways
you were able to improve on her and produce fruits
and plants never before known, and to increase
the production of Natures fields.
In short, when you ceased to believe in miracles
and special providence you started to rely
upon your-selves. The result has been an
accumulation of comforts and pleasures
of which your religious age never dreamed.
You must realize that by your own works only
you have progressed, and that you
have never progressed through
supine submission to Natures forces.
Page 91
But there are many phenomena that
cannot be explained by natural laws.
What can you say as to them? inquired the Modernist.
All the wonders of science to-day
would at one time in your course of development
have been called miracles and ascribed directly to
supernatural beings, answered the Martian.
Is it not, therefore, fair to presume that
what seems to you to-day to be beyond natural laws
is deemed so only because you have not acquired full
knowledge of the natural laws governing such phenomena?
Even should you see what you call the soul of a departed
friend, is not the perception more likely to be
due to some natural psychic or biological law
of which you are ignorant than to the existence
of a being separate and distinct from its material body,
since up to this time all experience of man
tells us that intelligence and life can exist only in
connection with matter?
Jesus appeared in the body
to His disciples after He died,
said the Fundamentalist.
How do you account for that?
One of your scientists has said that
in experimental science it is a mistake not to
doubt when facts do not compel you to affirm.
And I might add that, inasmuch as in all our
experience we have
never known Natures laws to be
other than immutable, it follows that before we
can assume a phenomenon to be supernatural
we must first be sure that it cannot be the result
of some natural law. You admit that you have
only a slight knowledge of Natures laws.
Have you,
in fact, any reasonable proof
of the occurrence of these miracles?
Page 92
Yes, yes.
We have proof incontrovertible,
exclaimed the Fundamentalist; those miracles occurred
because the Bible says they occurred.
There is the proof.
But where is your proof that the
Bible is true? asked the Martian.
Proof that the Bible is true?
repeated the Fundamentalist. There is no need
of proof; it is the Bible, the Word of God.
We know it is the Word of God, and we need no proof,
because we have FAITH.
Chapter XII
The Martian Examines Into Faith
Chapter X
The Martian Examines The
Moral Precepts Of Christianity
Home: Chapter I
The Martian Visits The Earth
The
Pagan origins of Easter
The
Easter Masquerade
Sixteen
Crucified Saviours
|